vendredi, novembre 13, 2015

Attentats sous fausse bannière : mythe ou réalité ? En savoir plus sur http://www.alterinfo.net/Attentats-sous-fausse-banniere-mythe-ou-realite_a113001.html#KkoGewrvhVQSWIJD.99
Publié par à 2 commentaires:

For these leaders, the worst students of history !

 The Biggest Secret In History: False Flag Terror

Submitted by George Washington


The age-old saying is true:
If we don’t learn history, we’re doomed to repeat it.
The single biggest historical secret which people haven’t yet learned is false flag terrorism.
There are many documented false flag attacks, where a government carries out a terror attack … and then falsely blames its enemy for political purposes.
False flag terror has changed the course of history over and over again … all over the world.   Unless people learn about false flags, governments will carry them out to start more and more disastrous wars.   (That’s why we continuously scour documents and sources to look for new admissions of false terror … and post updated lists when we find them.)
In the following instances, officials in the government which carried out the attack (or seriously proposed an attack) admit to it, either orally or in writing:
(1) Japanese troops set off a small explosion on a train track in 1931, and falsely blamed it on China in order to justify an invasion of Manchuria. This is known as the “Mukden Incident” or the “Manchurian Incident”. The Tokyo International Military Tribunal found: “Several of the participators in the plan, including Hashimoto [a high-ranking Japanese army officer], have on various occasions admitted their part in the plot and have stated that the object of the ‘Incident’ was to afford an excuse for the occupation of Manchuria by the Kwantung Army ….” And see this.
(2) A major with the Nazi SS admitted at the Nuremberg trials that – under orders from the chief of the Gestapo – he and some other Nazi operatives faked attacks on their own people and resources which they blamed on the Poles, to justify the invasion of Poland.
(3) Nazi general Franz Halder also testified at the Nuremberg trials that Nazi leader Hermann Goering admitted to setting fire to the German parliament building in 1933, and then falsely blaming the communists for the arson.
(4) Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev admitted in writing that the Soviet Union’s Red Army shelled the Russian village of Mainila in 1939 – while blaming the attack on Finland – as a basis for launching the “Winter War” against Finland. Russian president Boris Yeltsin agreed that Russia had been the aggressor in the Winter War.
(5) The Russian Parliament, current Russian president Putin and former Soviet leader Gorbachev all admit that Soviet leader Joseph Stalin ordered his secret police to execute 22,000 Polish army officers and civilians in 1940, and then falsely blamed it on the Nazis.
(6) The British government admits that – between 1946 and 1948 – it bombed 5 ships carrying Jews attempting to flee the Holocaust to seek safety in Palestine, set up a fake group called “Defenders of Arab Palestine”, and then had the psuedo-group falsely claim responsibility for the bombings (and see this, this and this).
(7) Israel admits that in 1954, an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind “evidence” implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed) (and see this and this).
(8) The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950′s to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister.
(9) The Turkish Prime Minister admitted that the Turkish government carried out the 1955 bombing on a Turkish consulate in Greece – also damaging the nearby birthplace of the founder of modern Turkey – and blamed it on Greece, for the purpose of inciting and justifying anti-Greek violence.
(10) The British Prime Minister admitted to his defense secretary that he and American president Dwight Eisenhower approved a plan in 1957 to carry out attacks in Syria and blame it on the Syrian government as a way to effect regime change.
(11) The former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence admit that NATO, with the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy and other European countries in the 1950s and blamed the communists, in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism. As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: “You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security” (and see this) (Italy and other European countries subject to the terror campaign had joined NATO before the bombings occurred). And watch this BBC special. They also allegedly carried out terror attacks in France, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, the UK, and other countries.
False flag attacks carried out pursuant tho this program include – by way of example only:
(12) In 1960, American Senator George Smathers suggested that the U.S. launch “a false attack made on Guantanamo Bay which would give us the excuse of actually fomenting a fight which would then give us the excuse to go in and [overthrow Castro]“.
(13) Official State Department documents show that, in 1961, the head of the Joint Chiefs and other high-level officials discussed blowing up a consulate in the Dominican Republic in order to justify an invasion of that country. The plans were not carried out, but they were all discussed as serious proposals.
(14) As admitted by the U.S. government, recently declassified documents show that in 1962, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. See the following ABC news report; the official documents; and watch this interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC’s World News Tonight with Peter Jennings.
(15) In 1963, the U.S. Department of Defense wrote a paper promoting attacks on nations within the Organization of American States – such as Trinidad-Tobago or Jamaica – and then falsely blaming them on Cuba.
(16) The U.S. Department of Defense even suggested covertly paying a person in the Castro government to attack the United States: “The only area remaining for consideration then would be to bribe one of Castro’s subordinate commanders to initiate an attack on Guantanamo.”
(17) The NSA admits that it lied about what really happened in the Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964 … manipulating data to make it look like North Vietnamese boats fired on a U.S. ship so as to create a false justification for the Vietnam war.
(18) A U.S. Congressional committee admitted that – as part of its “Cointelpro” campaign – the FBI had used many provocateurs in the 1950s through 1970s to carry out violent acts and falsely blame them on political activists.
(19) A top Turkish general admitted that Turkish forces burned down a mosque on Cyprus in the 1970s and blamed it on their enemy. He explained: “In Special War, certain acts of sabotage are staged and blamed on the enemy to increase public resistance. We did this on Cyprus; we even burnt down a mosque.” In response to the surprised correspondent’s incredulous look the general said, “I am giving an example”.
(20) A declassified 1973 CIA document reveals a program to train foreign police and troops on how to make booby traps, pretending that they were training them on how to investigate terrorist acts:
The Agency maintains liaison in varying degrees with foreign police/security organizations through its field stations  ….
[CIA provides training sessions as follows:]

a. Providing trainees with basic knowledge in the uses of commercial and military demolitions and incendiaries as they may be applied in terrorism and industrial sabotage operations.

b. Introducing the trainees to commercially available materials and home laboratory techniques, likely to he used in the manufacture of explosives and incendiaries by terrorists or saboteurs.

c. Familiarizing the trainees with the concept of target analysis and operational planning that a saboteur or terrorist must employ.

d. Introducing the trainees to booby trapping devices and techniques giving practical experience with both manufactured and improvised devices through actual fabrication.

***

The program provides the trainees with ample opportunity to develop basic familiarity and use proficiently through handling, preparing and applying the various explosive charges, incendiary agents, terrorist devices and sabotage techniques.
(21) The German government admitted (and see this) that, in 1978, the German secret service detonated a bomb in the outer wall of a prison and planted “escape tools” on a prisoner – a member of the Red Army Faction – which the secret service wished to frame the bombing on.
(22) A Mossad agent admits that, in 1984, Mossad planted a radio transmitter in Gaddaffi’s compound in Tripoli, Libya which broadcast fake terrorist trasmissions recorded by Mossad, in order to frame Gaddaffi as a terrorist supporter. Ronald Reagan bombed Libya immediately thereafter.
(23) The South African Truth and Reconciliation Council found that, in 1989, the Civil Cooperation Bureau (a covert branch of the South African Defense Force) approached an explosives expert and asked him “to participate in an operation aimed at discrediting the ANC [the African National Congress] by bombing the police vehicle of the investigating officer into the murder incident”, thus framing the ANC for the bombing.
(24) An Algerian diplomat and several officers in the Algerian army admit that, in the 1990s, the Algerian army frequently massacred Algerian civilians and then blamed Islamic militants for the killings (and see this video; and Agence France-Presse, 9/27/2002, French Court Dismisses Algerian Defamation Suit Against Author).
(25) The United States Army’s 1994 publication Special Forces Foreign Internal Defense Tactics Techniques and Procedures for Special Forces – updated in 2004 – recommends employing terrorists and using false flag operations to destabilize leftist regimes in Latin America. False flag terrorist attacks were carried out in Latin America and other regions as part of the CIA’s “Dirty Wars“. And see this.
(26) Similarly, a CIA “psychological operations” manual prepared by a CIA contractor for the Nicaraguan Contra rebels noted the value of assassinating someone on your own side to create a “martyr” for the cause. The manual was authenticated by the U.S. government. The manual received so much publicity from Associated Press, Washington Post and other news coverage that – during the 1984 presidential debate – President Reagan was confronted with the following question on national television:
At this moment, we are confronted with the extraordinary story of a CIA guerrilla manual for the anti-Sandinista contras whom we are backing, which advocates not only assassinations of Sandinistas but the hiring of criminals to assassinate the guerrillas we are supporting in order to create martyrs.
(27) An Indonesian fact-finding team investigated violent riots which occurred in 1998, and determined that “elements of the military had been involved in the riots, some of which were deliberately provoked”.
(28) Senior Russian Senior military and intelligence officers admit that the KGB blew up Russian apartment buildings in 1999 and falsely blamed it on Chechens, in order to justify an invasion of Chechnya (and see this report and this discussion).
(29) As reported by BBC, the New York Times, and Associated Press, Macedonian officials admit that the government murdered 7 innocent immigrants in cold blood and pretended that they were Al Qaeda soldiers attempting to assassinate Macedonian police, in order to join the “war on terror”.
(30) Senior police officials in Genoa, Italy admitted that – in July 2001, at the G8 summit in Genoa – planted two Molotov cocktails and faked the stabbing of a police officer, in order to justify a violent crackdown against protesters.
(31) The U.S. falsely blamed Iraq for playing a role in the 9/11 attacks – as shown by a memo from the defense secretary – as one of the main justifications for launching the Iraq war. Even after the 9/11 Commission admitted that there was no connection, Dick Cheney said that the evidence is “overwhelming” that al Qaeda had a relationship with Saddam Hussein’s regime, that Cheney “probably” had information unavailable to the Commission, and that the media was not ‘doing their homework’ in reporting such ties. Top U.S. government officials now admit that the Iraq war was really launched for oil … not 9/11 or weapons of mass destruction. Despite previous “lone wolf” claims, many U.S. government officials now say that 9/11 was state-sponsored terror; but Iraq was not the state which backed the hijackers. (Many U.S. officials have alleged that 9/11 was a false flag operation by rogue elements of the U.S. government; but such a claim is beyond the scope of this discussion. The key point is that the U.S. falsely blamed it on Iraq, when it knew Iraq had nothing to do with it.).
(32) Although the FBI now admits that the 2001 anthrax attacks were carried out by one or more U.S. government scientists, a senior FBI official says that the FBI was actually told to blame the Anthrax attacks on Al Qaeda by White House officials (remember what the anthrax letters looked like). Government officials also confirm that the white House tried to link the anthrax to Iraq as a justification for regime change in that country.
(33) According to the Washington Post, Indonesian police admit that the Indonesian military killed American teachers in Papua in 2002 and blamed the murders on a Papuan separatist group in order to get that group listed as a terrorist organization.
(34) The well-respected former Indonesian president also admits that the government probably had a role in the Bali bombings.
(35) Police outside of a 2003 European Union summit in Greece were filmed planting Molotov cocktails on a peaceful protester
(36) Former Department of Justice lawyer John Yoo suggested in 2005 that the US should go on the offensive against al-Qaeda, having “our intelligence agencies create a false terrorist organization. It could have its own websites, recruitment centers, training camps, and fundraising operations. It could launch fake terrorist operations and claim credit for real terrorist strikes, helping to sow confusion within al-Qaeda’s ranks, causing operatives to doubt others’ identities and to question the validity of communications.”
(37)  Similarly, in 2005, Professor John Arquilla of the Naval Postgraduate School – a renowned US defense analyst credited with developing the concept of ‘netwar’ – called for western intelligence services to create new “pseudo gang” terrorist groups, as a way of undermining “real” terror networks.  According to Pulitzer-Prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh, Arquilla’s ‘pseudo-gang’ strategy was, Hersh reported, already being implemented by the Pentagon:
“Under Rumsfeld’s new approach, I was told, US military operatives would be permitted to pose abroad as corrupt foreign businessmen seeking to buy contraband items that could be used in nuclear-weapons systems. In some cases, according to the Pentagon advisers, local citizens could be recruited and asked to join up with guerrillas or terrorists…
The new rules will enable the Special Forces community to set up what it calls ‘action teams’ in the target countries overseas which can be used to find and eliminate terrorist organizations. ‘Do you remember the right-wing execution squads in El Salvador?’ the former high-level intelligence official asked me, referring to the military-led gangs that committed atrocities in the early nineteen-eighties. ‘We founded them and we financed them,’ he said. ‘The objective now is to recruit locals in any area we want. And we aren’t going to tell Congress about it.’ A former military officer, who has knowledge of the Pentagon’s commando capabilities, said, ‘We’re going to be riding with the bad boys.’”
(38) United Press International reported in June 2005:
U.S. intelligence officers are reporting that some of the insurgents in Iraq are using recent-model Beretta 92 pistols, but the pistols seem to have had their serial numbers erased. The numbers do not appear to have been physically removed; the pistols seem to have come off a production line without any serial numbers. Analysts suggest the lack of serial numbers indicates that the weapons were intended for intelligence operations or terrorist cells with substantial government backing. Analysts speculate that these guns are probably from either Mossad or the CIA. Analysts speculate that agent provocateurs may be using the untraceable weapons even as U.S. authorities use insurgent attacks against civilians as evidence of the illegitimacy of the resistance.
(39) Undercover Israeli soldiers admitted in 2005 to throwing stones at other Israeli soldiers so they could blame it on Palestinians, as an excuse to crack down on peaceful protests by the Palestinians.
(40) Quebec police admitted that, in 2007, thugs carrying rocks to a peaceful protest were actually undercover Quebec police officers (and see this).
(41)  A 2008 US Army special operations field manual recommends that the U.S. military use surrogate non-state groups such as “paramilitary forces, individuals, businesses, foreign political organizations, resistant or insurgent organizations, expatriates, transnational terrorism adversaries, disillusioned transnational terrorism members, black marketers, and other social or political ‘undesirables.’” The manual specifically acknowledged that U.S. special operations can involve both counterterrorism and “Terrorism” (as well as “transnational criminal activities, including narco-trafficking, illicit arms-dealing, and illegal financial transactions.”)
(42) At the G20 protests in London in 2009, a British member of parliament saw plain clothes police officers attempting to incite the crowd to violence.
(43) Egyptian politicians admitted (and see this) that government employees looted priceless museum artifacts in 2011 to try to discredit the protesters.
(44) A Colombian army colonel has admitted that his unit murdered 57 civilians, then dressed them in uniforms and claimed they were rebels killed in combat.
(45) The highly-respected writer for the Telegraph Ambrose Evans-Pritchard says that the head of Saudi intelligence – Prince Bandar – recently admitted that the Saudi government controls “Chechen” terrorists.
(46) High-level American sources admitted that the Turkish government – a fellow NATO country – carried out the chemical weapons attacks blamed on the Syrian government; and high-ranking Turkish government admitted on tape plans to carry out attacks and blame it on the Syrian government.
(47) The Ukrainian security chief admits that the sniper attacks which started the Ukrainian coup were carried out in order to frame others. Ukrainian officials admit that the Ukrainian snipers fired on both sides, to create maximum chaos.
(48) Britain’s spy agency has admitted (and see this) that it carries out “digital false flag” attacks on targets, framing people by writing offensive or unlawful material … and blaming it on the target.
(49) U.S. soldiers have admitted that if they kill innocent Iraqis and Afghanis, they then “drop” automatic weapons near their body so they can pretend they were militants
(50) Similarly, police frame innocent people for crimes they didn’t commit. The practice is so well-known that the New York Times noted in 1981:
In police jargon, a throwdown is a weapon planted on a victim.
Newsweek reported in 1999:
Perez, himself a former [Los Angeles Police Department] cop, was caught stealing eight pounds of cocaine from police evidence lockers. After pleading guilty in September, he bargained for a lighter sentence by telling an appalling story of attempted murder and a “throwdown”–police slang for a weapon planted by cops to make a shooting legally justifiable. Perez said he and his partner, Officer Nino Durden, shot an unarmed 18th Street Gang member named Javier Ovando, then planted a semiautomatic rifle on the unconscious suspect and claimed that Ovando had tried to shoot them during a stakeout.
Wikipedia notes:
As part of his plea bargain, Pérez implicated scores of officers from the Rampart Division’s anti-gang unit, describing routinely beating gang members, planting evidence on suspects, falsifying reports and covering up unprovoked shootings.
(As a side note – and while not technically false flag attacks – police have been busted framing innocent people in many other ways, as well.)

So Common … There’s a Name for It

A former U.S. intelligence officer recently alleged:
Most terrorists are false flag terrorists or are created by our own security services.
This might be an exaggeration (and – as shown above – the U.S. isn’t the only one to play this terrible game). The point is that it is a very widespread strategy.
Indeed, this form of deceit is so common that it was given a name hundreds of years ago.
“False flag terrorism” is defined as a government attacking its own people, then blaming others in order to justify going to war against the people it blames. Or as Wikipedia defines it:
False flag operations are covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to appear as if they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one’s own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and have been used in peace-time; for example, during Italy’s strategy of tension.
The term comes from the old days of wooden ships, when one ship would hang the flag of its enemy before attacking another ship. Because the enemy’s flag, instead of the flag of the real country of the attacking ship, was hung, it was called a “false flag” attack.
Indeed, this concept is so well-accepted that rules of engagement for naval, air and land warfare all prohibit false flag attacks. Specifically, the rules of engagement state that a military force can fly the enemy’s flag, imitate their markings, or dress in an enemy’s clothes … but that the ruse has to be discarded before attacking.
Why are the rules of engagement so specific? Obviously, because nations have been using false flag attacks for many centuries. And the rules of engagement are at least trying to limit false flag attacks so that they aren’t used as a false justification for war.
In other words, the rules of engagement themselves are an admission that false flag terrorism is a very common practice.

Leaders Throughout History Have Acknowledged False Flags

Leaders throughout history have acknowledged the danger of false flags:
“Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death”.
– Adolph Hitler

“Why of course the people don’t want war … But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship … Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
– Hermann Goering, Nazi leader.

“The easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of terror. [The public] will clamor for such laws if their personal security is threatened”.
– Josef Stalin
 Are you going to stay silent as your government implements the evil tactics of Hitler, Goering and Stalin? Or are you going to spread the word, and educate others as to history's crucial missing puzzle piece ... false flag terror?
http://www.zerohedge.com/users/george-washington 
Publié par à 5 commentaires:

Paris attacks: Dozens dead and hostages held at Bataclan

3 minutes ago
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34814203

Publié par à 4 commentaires:

France : Etat d'Urgence Sur Tout Le Territoire!

Des dizaines de morts dans plusieurs fusillades à Paris, une prise d'otages en cours au Bataclan





Plusieurs attaques se sont produites en même temps dans la région parisienne et ont fait au moins 35 morts selon une source proche du dossier citée par l'AFP. Selon nos informations, le bilan a de fortes chances de s'aggraver notamment car de nombreuses personnes sont grièvement blessées. Trois ou quatre explosions ont eu lieu aux abords du Stade de France, près de la porte D, où avait lieu le match de football France-Allemagne. Il s'agit d'actions kamikazes menées avec des ceintures d'explosifs qui contenaient des boulons, selon les premières constatations.

Dans le même temps, au moins deux fusillades ont éclaté à Paris. La première a eu lieu dans un restaurant du Xe arrondissement à hauteur des rues Alibert et Bichat. La seconde s'est produite dans le secteur du Bataclan, la salle de spectacle du XIe arrondissement où se déroule actuellement une prise d'otages. Une soixantaine de personnes seraient retenues. Les unités spéciales du RAID et de la BRI ont pris place autour des lieux.

Il s'agit vraisemblablement des attaques les plus meurtrières à Paris depuis la Seconde Guerre mondiale. La mairie de Paris a demandé aux habitants de rester chez eux et donc de ne pas s'aventurer dans les rues parisiennes. L'état d'urgence et la fermeture des frontières ont été décrétées par François Hollande sur l'ensemble du territoire.
 http://www.rtl.fr/actu/societe-faits-divers/une-fusillade-dans-le-xe-arrondissement-de-paris-aurait-fait-plusieurs-morts-7780498853
Plus d'infos »
Publié par à 2 commentaires:

dimanche, novembre 01, 2015

61 ans de la Révolution Algérienne - Hommage aux Martyrs/res de Novembre 54 -1962


A la mémoire du million et demi de nos martyrs,connus et anonymes, ainsi qu'à ces 9 héros, déclencheurs de la Révolution Algérienne... 
Cette date du 1er Novembre 54 - ciment de l'unité de notre peuple et fierté des générations futures. N'oublions jamais nos "Historiques" - sans eux nous n'existerons pas aujourd'hui ! 

Et aussi, gloire aux  Moudjahidate, héroïnes martyres de la révolution Algérienne, qui n'ont  pu arriver au rendez-vous avec l' indépendance nationale. Mais elles demeureront à jamais, plus vivantes, que les survivants, dans l'Histoire de notre pays. Par leur sacrifice suprême, elles ont fait mentir tous les obscurantismes religieux, culturels et politiques!  Le destin les a tenues hors de la corruption du pouvoir et de l'arbitraire des privilèges, en les hissant au paradis céleste, de ceux et celles qui sacrifient leur vie, pour autre  chose, que les biens matériels... Vous avez réhabilité notre dignité de femmes,  renforcé celle des hommes dans la promesse tenue d' une patrie libre.  Mais  cette dignité se doit maintenant d'être prolongée dans la fierté et l'unité du peuple, qui aujourd'hui est composé d' une majorité de jeunes... en attente de reconnaissance! 
Reposez tous en Paix, martyrs/res bien-aimés de Dieu, et de votre peuple - pour l'éternité!  

Publié par à 4 commentaires:

dimanche, février 15, 2015

JE SUIS les 100 artistes Anglais...

Oui, je suis  eux, car avant "d'être ou ne pas être", je suis celle, et celui  qui pleure avec moi, la perte de la Palestine et El-Qods.
Une centaine d' intellectuel (les) et artistes Britanniques initient une pétition, qui à l'heure actuelle a récolté plus de 700 signatures de célébrités pour dénoncer la "catastrophe humanitaire" à Gaza.

Voilà qui nous encourage à croire qu'il existe encore du bien dans le coeur humain! Autrement dit,  le sens de la solidarité et le courage de la liberté d'expression dans le monde des arts - si ce n'est
( hélas!) en France, du moins au Royaume-Uni! Pendant que l'Europe, rameutée par la France, gesticule dans l' hystérie islamophobe, en s'enfonçant dans le piège que lui tend l' E.I, relayé par les cris d' orfraie des sionistes, prompts à tirer les "marrons du feu" de tout  attentat terroriste,  les artistes anglais, eux,  gardent la tête froide en regardant du bon côté: la Palestine.

Il faut bien le dire, depuis les terribles derniers attentats en France, gouvernants,  politiques, intellectuels, journalistes sont aux abois.  Et comme toujours, ce sont les paisibles travailleurs musulmans français qui seront désignés à la persécution morale et du tout sécuritaire. Même les enfants, de la maternelle, au primaire, iront en garde-à vue, en tant que "terroristes potentiels"! Et l'on voit avec stupeur, les écoles françaises jadis citées en exemple dans le monde, se transformer en annexes de commissariat! La peur sue dans les rues de France. Et le délire aussi. Car les intellectuel(les) et autres intervenants dans les "Talk show" télévisés ne parlent-ils de supprimer des versets "dangereux" du Coran?! Et même,  l'expression sainte de "Allahou Akbar" est d' ores et déjà placée sous haute surveillance,  syndrome de "radicalisation", et passible de toutes les traques policières, si le musulman, la prononce en dehors de ses prières rituelles à la mosquée ou chez lui... Quant aux Juifs de France, les voilà tous, canonisés martyrs sacrés de la liberté d' expression, et Israël, l'ange purifié et purificateur de tous péchés. N'a-t -on pas vu Netanyahou, les mains encore tièdes du sang des Gazaouis, défiler au premier rang durant la marche des chefs d'états étrangers à Paris, contre le terroriste? Et ce faisant, salir la mémoire des pauvres victimes de "Charlie", et de l'épicerie "Super Casher". Le plus significatif, de cette descente aux enfers de l'hypocrisie, c'est qu'aucun politique, ni intellectuel, pas même un média, n'aura protesté contre la présence du tyran sioniste!  

Tout comme nul, parmi ces "grandes gueules" des débats télévisés, ces experts "alibi" n'a osé analyser "à qui profite le crime" de tous ces carnages de l' E.I spécialement contre les musulmans, ainsi que leurs actions terroristes en France et dernièrement au Danemark?  Le moins intoxiqué par la propagande des médias aux ordres, aurait compris que le bénéficiaire est Israël, et dans sa foulée,  ces pays qui le soutiennent et le protègent notamment à l' ONU. Du coup, je n'exagère pas, quand je pense que ces deux forces des ténèbres, ont des intérêts communs...

 C'est ainsi, qu' à chaque fois que l'armée d' Israël, perpètre un nouveau massacre à Gaza, en étranglant plus fort, les maigres territoires de la Palestine occupée, dans l'étau de l'encerclement, et du vol de plus en plus de terres pour construire plus de colonies - il arrive soudain un "danger"  du monde arabe et musulman pour détourner l'attention du monde. Si ce n'est pas le terrorisme, ou " le Printemps Arabe", sinon  l'effondrement de pays souverains comme la Libye, l' Irak, la Syrie... ce sera l' Ukraine. N'importe quoi, pourvu que les actions génocidaires d' Israël contre les Palestiniens, ne fassent pas la UNE de la presse mondiale! C'est en ce sens, que la morale sélective à de plus en plus gangréné l' opinion occidentale, en corrompant tous les principes de droit de justice en politique internationale, et pervertie l'idéal de la démocratie et de la liberté d'expression. Tout cela dans l'amalgame perfide du sionisme avec l'antisémitisme, tout comme la cause juste du peuple Palestinien, de politique, le lavage de cerveau tous-azimuts- sioniste, la "Pavlovisée" en guerre de religion - islamiste...
Tout est faussé, tronqué et les occidentaux les authentiques coupables de touts les malheurs des Juifs, sont devenus les hérauts du plus sanglant des mensonges depuis la 2e guerre mondiale!  

Pourtant, malgré ces temps obscurs de l'injustice et de la complicité occidentale avec les crimes contre l' humanité d' Israël,  il ne faut pas désespérer de l'humanité, ainsi que nous le démontre l'exemple des artistes anglais.

Dans une lettre publiée samedi par le Guardian, plus d’une centaine de personnalités britanniques ont annoncé qu’ils signaient la pétition anti-israélienne intitulée "Artistes pour la Palestine UK" et qu’ils participeraient dorénavant au boycott de l’Etat hébreu et de ses institutions.

Le romancier et essayiste Hari Kunzru, l’ex-chanteur de The Verve Ken Loach et le cinéaste
Mike Leigh figurent notamment parmi les nouveaux signataires.

"Nous annonçons aujourd’hui que nous renonçons à engager des relations culturelles avec Israël", indique la lettre. "Nous n’accepterons ni les invitations professionnelles ni les financements provenant d'une institution liée au gouvernement israélien".

Dénonçant la "catastrophe humanitaire provoquée par la guerre de Gaza", la pétition cite un rapport de B’Tselem, ONG israélienne qui présente comme "le centre israélien d’information pour les droits de l’homme dans les territoires occupés", qui évoquait 2014 comme l’"une des années les plus cruelles et meurtrières de l’histoire de l’occupation". Pour voir la liste des signataires cliquer: http://artistsforpalestine.org.uk

C'est cela la dignité éthique et morale des intellectuel (les) et des artistes, les seuls qui méritent l'honneur de s' auto-définir comme -citoyens du monde-. À ne pas confondre avec ces thuriféraires qui, pour passer à la télé, ou avoir une quelconque récompense de ces pays aux mains tachées du sang Palestinien et même de celui de leur propre peuple, sont prêts à tous les reniements.Comme dit Pascal Boniface : " Ces intellectuels faussaires cherchent aussi à faire taire les autres", sinon par leurs écrits mystificateurs,  ce sera par l'entremise d' une certaine presse aux journalistes carriéristes sans foi, ni loi.  

Publié par à 6 commentaires:

samedi, février 14, 2015

Assia Djebar au delà des controverses algériennes...



"La vérité ne se dégage pas de la polémique, mais des oeuvres qu'on a faites" ( Paul Gauguin). 

À contre-courant des polémiques et des "fitna" intellectuelles et ou politiques, j'atteste  que Assia Djebar eut droit à des obsèques officielles, organisées sur ordre du Gouvernement. Cercueil recouvert du drapeau algérien, transporté par des éléments de la Protection civile, et une dernière haie d' honneur.

La romancière et membre de l' Académie Française,  de son vrai nom Fatma-Zohra Imalayène, née le 30 juin 1936 à Aïn Bessam ( Bouira, en Algérie)  décédée, après une longue maladie,  le 6 février 2015 à Paris, a été inhumée, hier matin, au cimetière de Cherchell. Cette commune de Tipaza, n'est certes pas, sa ville natale, mais néanmoins, une des sources de son inspiration littéraire, notamment son premier film de fiction en 1978 - "La nouba des femmes du Mont Chenoua", produit par la télévision algérienne. Coïncidence ou pas, elle reposera désormais,  plus ou moins loin,  de la stèle érigée en hommage à l'endroit ou Albert Camus aimait à se tenir...

 Pour ma part, je n'ai pu me rendre à Cherchell, pour ses obsèques, mais j'étais présente à l' hommage qui lui fut rendu au Palais de la Culture, jeudi dernier. Nous étions près d' une centaine de personnes, du monde des arts et des lettres ainsi que de la politique et des Associations pour les droits des femmes, à nous recueillir devant la dépouille de la défunte. Parmi ces personnalités, je cite celles que je connais, telle la ministre de la Culture Nadia Labidi, l'Ambassadeur de France, l'Ambassadrice du Chili,  l'ex-ministre et écrivaine Zhor Ounissi, Amina Dabache directrice du quotidien arabophone "El Chaab", la leader du PT, Louisa Hanoune, etc.

Cependant, que la plus intense émotion qui me fit venir les larmes aux yeux , fut au moment où je présentai mes condoléances à la famille, dont sa mère Baya, une extraordinaire dame presque centenaire, à l'esprit vif, qui me fixa d'un regard étincelant d' intelligence, en me disant: " Merci... Aïcha Lemsine, oui, je vous connais.. Assia m'avait parlée de vous." 
  
Soudain des souvenirs refluèrent en force... Cet article du journal  "le Monde" en 1976, de Françoise Wagener, au sujet de mon premier roman -  avec cette phrase: " La Chrysalide", que son aînée, Assia Djebar, a aimé...". Elle avait donc été ma "première" lectrice!!!

Par la suite, je l'avais rencontrée , au cocktail de promotion de mon livre, organisé par mes éditrices à Paris. Elle était là, belle, sympathique et chaleureuse,  découvrant avec enthousiasme, cette toute nouvelle "Edition des Femmes" qui faisait  alors, beaucoup parler d' elles, et chez qui, elle publiera quatre années plus tard, "Femmes d'Alger dans leur appartement" - nouvelles  (1980). 

 Puis,  durant les années 90, aux Etats-Unis, où j'étais correspondante "diplomatique", pour "The Washington Report on Middle East Affairs " en même temps, que vice- présidente du "Women'World Writers" ( organisation mondiale des femmes écrivains) basée à New-York, je la croiserai une deuxième fois... Peu après,  j'avais quitté les States, et ce fut à son tour d'y vivre... 

C'est ainsi que nous nous étions perdues de vue, jusqu'à ce triste jour de son décès. C'était une voix qui était aussi, mienne, dans le sens, où Assia Djebar avait  étrangement, continué et développé les thèmes de mes livres ( la Chrysalide: 1976) et mon essai sur le monde Arabe et l' Islam :  "Ordalie des Voix" - Les femmes Arabes parlent " - ( Paris- 1982).

Et voilà qu'après tant d'années, elle est là, sans vie , mais "immortelle", beaucoup plus sûrement à travers sa formidable oeuvre littéraire, que par la grâce l'Académie française- qui comme chacun sait, obéit surtout au "politiquement correct", sinon à des intérêts politiques conjoncturels... D'autant plus que contrairement au Prix Nobel, cette "distinction" française  coûte trop chère. Car il faut savoir que la confection de l’habit d'apparat à 35 000 euros, et l'épée  jusqu'à 100 000 des  membres de cette illustre aéropage est à la charge du nouvel entrant... 

Ceci pour rappeler, que rien ne dure, pas même le bruit de la renommée, sauf la voix de la conscience qui demeure empreinte dans les écrits de l'écrivain, du poète, et dans la mémoire de ceux de qui, on a réussit à se faire aimer. 

À l'image de ces femmes, largement majoritaires dans la salle, qui ont accueilli tes restes mortels,  en scandant des "youyous"... avec  ce moment bouleversant,  quand la lourdeur de la peine, qui pesait dans l'air, fut déchirée par la voix pure de Djoher Amhis, entonnant les merveilleux chants religieux berbères de Taos Amrouche. 

En vérité, quoi qu'en disent les sempiternels faiseurs de polémique, l'Algérie t'a rendu les honneurs qui te revenaient de droit. Et cela, non, pour l'octroi prodigieux de tes prix et médailles étrangères, mais pour avoir  été, une écrivaine qui aura glorifié la grandeur et aussi la misère de notre pays; écrit  la parole forte et résistante des femmes algériennes contre les lois injustes d' un patriarcat toujours aux aguets,  en les faisant connaître par delà nos frontières.  Tout cela, dans une pensée plurielle de toutes les écrivaines algériennes, comme tu le reconnaissais toi-même dans ces mots: 
" J’écris, comme tant d’autres femmes écrivains algériennes avec un sentiment d’urgence, contre la régression et la misogynie".
 Que Dieu ait ton Âme, Assia - Fatma-Zohra, et que la terre te soit légère.
     نا لله وإنا إليه راجعون

 ولا حول ولا قوة إلا بالله العلي العظيم

Publié par à 5 commentaires:
Inscription à : Articles (Atom)